Cost-Efficient Composite Processing Techniques for Aerospace Applications – A Review

Article Preview

Abstract:

Composite materials have been used in aircraft components since the early beginning of aircraft industry establishment.Undenaible advantages of composites in mechanical properties and light weight in comparison with conventional metal alloys make them desirable alternative for fabrication of different aircraft components. However, quality concerns and high costs of processing tackle the extensive usage of composites in aircraft structure, until the past decade, introducing new generation of composite processing techniques, needless of traditional autoclave processing and capable of fabricating aerospace-grade quality composite parts more time and cost efficiently. In this paper concise review over recent cost-efficient composite processing technologies with proven practicality in commercial aircraft applications, is presented.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1465-1470

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

[1] DANIEL, I. M., ISHAI, O. 1994. Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials, Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar

[2] SK, M. 2002. Composites manufacturing: materials, product, and process engineering, New York, CRC Press LLC.

Google Scholar

[3] HOU TH, B. J., ZIMMERMAN TJ, ET AL. 2010. Evaluation of sandwich structure bonding in out-of-autoclave processing. SAMPE Technical Conference. South lake city.

Google Scholar

[4] J.KRATZ, P. H. 2011. Processing out-of-autoclave honeycomb structures: internal core measurements Composites: Part A, 42, 1060–1065.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.009

Google Scholar

[5] BOND, G., GRIFFITH, M., J., HAHN, L., G., BONGIOVANNI, C., BOYD & J. 2009. A Study of Non-Autoclave Prepreg Manufacturing Technology, Covina, CA, ETATS-UNIS, SAMPE.

Google Scholar

[6] TATUM, S. 2001. VARTM Cuts Costs. Reinforced Plastics 45.

Google Scholar

[7] HABERKERN, H. 2006. Tailor-made reinforcements. Reinforced Plastics, 50, 28-3

DOI: 10.1016/s0034-3617(06)70974-2

Google Scholar

[8] RIDGARD, C. 2009. Out of autoclave composite technology for aerospace, defense, and space structures. SAMPE 09. Baltimore.

Google Scholar

[9] MAHENDRAN, M. E. A. 2009. Feasibility Study of Closed Cavity Bag Molding (CCBM) for Novel Modeless Manufacturing of Carbon-Epoxy Composites. Canadian Aeronautics and Space Institute AERO'09 Conference, 20th Aerospace Structures and Materials Symposium. Ottawa.

Google Scholar

[10] BENDER, D., SCHUSTER, J. & HEIDER, D. 2006. Flow rate control during vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) processing. Composites Science and Technology, 66, 2265-2271.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.008

Google Scholar

[11] CHUNG HAE PARK & SAOUAB, A. 2009. Analytical Modeling of Composite Molding by Resin Infusion with Flexible Tooling: VARI and RFI processes. Journal of Composite Materials, 43, 1877-1900.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998309341848

Google Scholar

[12] JHAN, Y.-T., LEE, Y.-J. & CHUNG, C.-H. 2011. Resin flowing analysis in sandwich laminates under VARTM process. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 30, 533-545.

DOI: 10.1177/0731684411399142

Google Scholar

[13] HSIAO, K. T., GILLESPIE, J.W. JR., ADVANI, S.G. AND FINK, B.K. 2001. Role of Vacuum Pressure and Port Locations on Flow Front Control for Liquid Composite Molding Processes. Polymer Composites, 22, 660–668.

DOI: 10.1002/pc.10568

Google Scholar

[14] LI, W., KREHL, J., GILLESPIE, J. W., HEIDER, D., ENDRULAT, M., HOCHREIN, K., DUNHAM, M. G. & DUBOIS, C. J. 2004. Process and Performance Evaluation of the Vacuum-Assisted Process. Journal of Composite Materials, 38, 1803-1814.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998304044769

Google Scholar

[15] FILSINGER, J., LORENZ, T., STADLER, F. AND UTECHT, S. 2001. Method and Device for Producing Fiber-reinforced Components Using an Injection Method. German patent application.

Google Scholar

[16] SUMMER SCALES, J. 2010. Composites Design and Manufacture-Composites Manufacturing Processes [Online]. Available:http://www.tech.plym.ac.uk/sme/MATS324/MATS324C.

Google Scholar

[17] LI, W., KREHL, J., GILLESPIE, J. W., HEIDER, D., ENDRULAT, M., HOCHREIN, K., DUNHAM, M. G. & DUBOIS, C. J. 2004. Process and Performance Evaluation of the Vacuum-Assisted Process. Journal of Composite Materials, 38, 1803-1814.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998304044769

Google Scholar

[18] SEEMANN WH. 1990. Plastic transfer molding techniques for the production of fiber reinforced plastic structures. US patent application.

Google Scholar

[19] HAN, K., JIANG, S., ZHANG, C. & WANG, B. 2000. Flow modeling and simulation of SCRIMP for composites manufacturing. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 31, 79-86.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-835x(99)00053-6

Google Scholar

[20] WOODS, J., MODIN, A.E., HAWKINS, R.D. AND HANKS, D.J. 2008. Controlled Atmospheric Pressure Infusion Process. United States patent application.

Google Scholar

[21] NIGGEMANN, C., YOUNG SEOK SONG, GILLESPIE, J. W. & HEIDER, D. 2008. Experimental Investigation of the Controlled Atmospheric Pressure Resin Infusion (CAPRI) Process. Journal of Composite Materials, 42, 1049-1061.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998308090650

Google Scholar

[22] TAKEDA, F. 2005. Research in the Application of the VaRTM Technique to the Fabrication of Primary Aircraft Composite Structures. Technical Review Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.

Google Scholar

[23] T. SHINODA, H. O., E. WADAHARA, Y. KOMORI, T. SHONO. 2007. A-VaRTM Technology Application for Japan's New Regional Jet Aircraft. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM-16). Kyoto,Japan.

Google Scholar

[24] GARSCHKE, C., WEIMER, C., PARLEVLIET, P. P. & FOX, B. L. 2012. Out-of-autoclave cure cycle study of a resin film infusion process using in situ process monitoring. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 43, 935-94

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.01.003

Google Scholar